Translation from English

Sunday, August 9, 2015

Times of India- Army Rules Out "Offensive" Tattoos for Officers

ADVERTISEMENT
The Times of India
India

The Times of India
You are here: News Home » India

Army says no to ‘offensive tattoo’ while hiring officers

Army says no to ‘offensive tattoo’ while hiring officers
Applicants with objectionable tattoos, defined by the Army in its policy notified in June, would be rejected at stage-I of the five-day selection process for commissioned officers. (TOI Photo)
CHANDIGARH: Tattoos are a taboo for Army — it's official now. The Army has decided to show zero tolerance to "offensive" tattoos during the selection of commissioned officers. 

According to a new policy approved by the Army authorities, a candidate appearing for an interview for commissioned officer will have to fill a separate form giving complete details of tattoos on his body. If the tattoo is within the approved parameters and is cleared by the selection board, the candidate will have to file an affidavit that he would not have any more tattoos on his body before leaving for pre-commissioning training.

READ ALSO: Govt readies 'reader-friendly' account of India's wars & ops 

The Army had set the regulations on display of body tattoos for recruitment of jawans in July 2012, but this was not applicable for commissioned officers' selection. The authorities have now come up with a clear policy on tattoos for the officers also. 

Applicants with objectionable tattoos, defined by the Army in its policy notified in June, would be rejected at stage-I of the five-day selection process for commissioned officers. 

As per the policy, a copy of which is with TOI, candidates belonging to tribal communities would be permitted to have permanent tattoos on any part of the body, provided they conform to the existing customs and traditions of the tribe to which a candidate belongs. For others, only small innocuous tattoos, that are not prejudicial to good order and military discipline, would be permitted.

READ ALSO: Army aspirants to be disqualified if they sport tattoo 

The policy, however, has clarified that if an applicant has undergone tattoo removal surgery before appearing for the interview and the same has faded substantially, it will be treated as a "scar". 

The policy states that a candidate appearing before the services selection board (SSB) would be thoroughly screened for tattoos. A separate sheet would be prepared along with the dossier in which complete record of the tattoos on his body would be maintained. 

Scheduled tribe category candidates will have to submit a certificate signed by the deputy commissioner or sub-divisional magistrate prior to stage-I of the selection process, stating that their community permits permanent body tattoos. 

General category candidates can have small innocuous tattoos on inner face of forearms — from inside of the elbow to the wrist of both the hands — which can be religious symbols or names of near and dear ones. 

However, tattoos, which are offensive to modesty, decency or propriety and those that advocate a philosophy which demeans a person based on gender would not be permissible for all. Similarly, racist tattoos that advocate a philosophy that degrades or demeans a person based on race, ethnicity or region and religion would be prohibited for all categories. 

The new policy has also stipulated that the selected candidates would be thoroughly examined before undergoing pre-commissioning training to ensure that they have not tattooed their body after the selection by the board. 

In July 2012, army had clarified that candidates appearing for selection as jawans with limited and prescribed sized tattoos on inner parts of their arms or on the back of their palms will be eligible for selection. The size of the tattoo has been limited to 5cm in length and 3cm in breadth. 

In the US, soldiers are allowed to tattoo their arms, legs and most parts of their bodies. 
Stay updated on the go with Times of India News App. Click here to download it for your device.
Follow the Times of India - India section
Search for News
Search

Recent Messages (24)

Sort By:
Anupam Das9947
Never liked tattoos though ...... Graffiti are best done on walls not on bodies!
3 0 ReplyFlag
Sainath Kalpathy26659
I have had the fortune to be watching these Army jawans n many officers, having been in Armed forces family myself as well as lliving in cantonment, My observation is thet the QUALITY of ARMY men have serious FALLEN ( officers more n men or ORs as well ), their fitness levels n zeal is a goner ! most of these guys are plain stupid unfit for other jobs and are plainly going thru a motion and are not inducing any trust as such ! yes we have technology, but men quality is seriously DOWN ! Army needs ... Read More
1 0 ReplyFlag
msr00695328
TO THE POINT. WE ARE GOING THROUGH THE BIHARISATION OF THE INDIAN ARMY. LOOT AND SCOOT GENTRY WITH INTOLERANT RELIGIOUS, CASTE, REGIONAL, DIETARY, COLOUR PREJUDICES ARE JOINING ARMY IN LARGE NUMBERS. SOON IT WILL BE LIKE UP - PROVINCIAL ARMED CONSTABULARY.
0 0 ReplyFlag
Mahindranath Madhavan2283
GOD HAS GIVEN US A BEAUTIFUL BODY WHY TO DISFIGURE WITH TATOOS.
1 1 ReplyFlag
Utpal Bhuyan2613
Choice. We should have the choice to do so.
0 0 ReplyFlag
Anthony Barbosa28407
To make it even more beautiful
0 0 ReplyFlag
Rajeev Pandey29475
At least Indian Army took a first positive step for this nuisance.
0 0 ReplyFlag

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please leave a comment-- or suggestions, particularly of topics and places you'd like to see covered