Translation from English

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Yes, The Peacock is Vainer than the Peahen- Washington Post

Study shows men are more narcissistic than women. This surprises no one.

 March 5 at 6:39 AM  
Depressing news from the world of psychology: Nearly every stereotype about the gender gap with regards to narcissism, ambition and leadership is right.
That’s according to a study in the March issue of the Psychological Bulletin, the journal of the American Psychological Association. In a review of three decades of survey data from nearly half a million participants, researchers found that men are more likely to demonstrate narcissistic behavior than women, regardless of generation or age.
With what must have been a tremendous tolerance for inflated egos, the researchers examined some of humanity’s least-attractive characteristics — manipulativeness, self-absorption, aggression and arrogance among them — and looked at how people responded to statements that included “If I ruled the world, it would be a much better place” and “I know that I am good because everyone keeps telling me so.” Lucky them.
They then qualified “narcissism” according to three facets: entitlement, leadership/authority and grandiose/exhibitionism. Men scored measurably higher than women in the first two categories and were more likely to agree with phrases like “I like having authority over people” and “I insist upon getting the respect that is due to me.” They were also more likely to exploit others and to believe that they were entitled to special privileges. But there was hardly any deviation between the two genders in the grandiose/exhibitionism category, which includes qualities like vanity and self-absorption.
Higher levels of narcissism have been a helpful adaptation for men, the study said, boosting their self-esteem and emotional stability and making them more likely to take on leadership roles. But it has its drawbacks.
“Narcissism is associated with various interpersonal dysfunctions, including an inability to maintain healthy long-term relationships, unethical behavior and aggression,” lead author Emily Grijalva, a professor at the University of Buffalo, said in a news release.
The study doesn’t tell us anything we didn’t already assume, but it is the first systematic review to back up the magnitude of gender stereotypes with actual data, according to Grijalva. It also looks into why those stereotypes exist in the first place.
“Individuals tend to observe and learn gender roles from a young age, and may face backlash for deviating from society’s expectations,” Grijalva said. “In particular, women often receive harsh criticism for being aggressive or authoritative, which creates pressure for women, more so than for men, to suppress displays of narcissistic behavior.”
Stereotypes about the way men and women exhibit entitlement and leadership can be self-perpetuating, the study argued. For example, women score lower on the leadership/authority facet, meaning that they are less likely to wind up in leadership roles. But the resulting lack of female leaders could then reinforce the idea that women are worse leaders and less authoritative, pushing women to suppress those aspects of themselves to conform to gender expectations.
“For a woman who has deeply internalized a feminine gender identity, endorsing gender-stereotypical occupational preferences might be a mechanism used to avow her femininity to herself and to others,” the study said.
The study did include one piece of good news: Neither female nor male college students are any more narcissistic now than they were in 1990. Hopefully that means we can stop writing think-pieces about the “me, me, me generation” and the worrying selfie trend.
More from Morning Mix:
Sarah Kaplan is a reporter for Morning Mix.
104
 
COMMENTS
104 Comments
Mentioned in this story and want to comment? Learn more
outofthebox1
3:27 PM EST
Yet another study that's a brilliant use of someone's tax dollars.
CalypsoSummer
10:45 PM EST [Edited]
The REAL waste of someone's tax dollars was all the money spent on outo's public education. Poor outo seriously fails with reading comprehension -- this was not a gov't-funded study.
Volucre
2:44 PM EST [Edited]
The problem with this study is that questions about narcissistic traits are usually gender-loaded toward women or men, and based on the types of naricissism questions you choose to ask, you effectively rig the results to make one gender or the other look worse. Here's how it works: 
 
Step 1: Ask questions that have more to do with assertiveness than narcissism, such that men are more likely to say "yes" to them, like "Do you like having authority over people?” and “Do you insist upon getting the respect that is due to you?”  
 
Step 2: Don't ask too many questions that women are more likely to say "yes" to, like "Do you usually spend more than an hour doing yourself up to go to work, school, or out with friends?" or "Do you spend more than $100 a month on beauty products?" 
 
Step 3: Conclude, predictably enough, that men are more narcissistic than women. 
 
Step 4: Circulate the results to radical feminist journalistas so that they can gloat about it in offensive terms, while hiding behind the purported cloak of scientific objectivity.
calendarboy
3:12 PM EST
Well said!
lechuza42
3:52 PM EST
Did you actually read the article? "There was hardly any deviation between the two genders in the grandiose/exhibitionism category [of narcissism], which includes qualities like vanity and self-absorption."
Volucre
4:17 PM EST [Edited]
Lechuza, your comment just highlights the fact that there are multiple categories of narcissism, that men and women don't score the same on all of them, and thus that it matters what categories a study chooses to focus on (and also how the study splits up behavior types among different categories).  
 
In any event, I don't think preening in front of a mirror or buying beauty products is quite a match for the category of "grandiose/exhibitionism," since you do those things privately and out-of-sight. I think "exhibitionism" is, say, wearing revealing clothes or flexing in your Facebook pictures.
disorderedworld
2:31 PM EST
Characterising the issue as men versus women is neither helpful or accurate. There is no significant evidence to show that boys and girls are innately different at birth with regard to vitally important and destructive behaviours such as pathological narcissism and violent behaviour. Instead the evidence suggests that more men are socialised to be narcissistic and violent than women. That's not to deny the obvious fact that some women are pathologically narcissistic and some women are violent, but more boys are socialised in these ways than girls are. It's in the interest of both sexes that both boys and girls grow up to become empathic and peaceful adults. The fact is that the larger change must be in the norms of how boys are taught to become men. http://t.co/V6pQLin6i0
DC-NYC-ATL-Lady
2:36 PM EST
Well said.
xuinkrbin.
2:22 PM EST
If I put together an article based on a study claiming to show Women are more spiteful/petty than Men and said, "This surprises no one," would the Author say I was being sexist or misogynistic? Would the Author excuse My statement if I said "The study doesn’t tell us anything we didn’t already assume, but it is the first systematic review to back up the magnitude of gender stereotypes with actual data" and "It also looks into why those stereotypes exist in the first place"? I would hope the answer is "No." Therefore, why would the Author write a piece like this?
DC-NYC-ATL-Lady
2:46 PM EST
This is critique that I can buy into. The article does seem to be slightly mean to men, which is completely the tone of the author, as the paper the article is about obviously has no "tone." It's fair to take umbrage at the snarkiness. 
Crickey7
12:52 PM EST
If you were as handsome and clever as me, you'd be a narcissist, too.
calendarboy
12:23 PM EST
I think it's important for men to learn and understand the word "misandrist." 
 
Misandrist: A person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against men. 
 
Example: This article is written by a misandrist. 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please leave a comment-- or suggestions, particularly of topics and places you'd like to see covered