Finally! California Just Issued Mandatory State Water Restrictions
Jerry Brown must be a Gizmodo reader because he apparently heard my parched plea: Today, the California governor issued mandatory water restrictions for the state—the first in history.
Standing in a dry Sierra Nevada meadow which is usually buried under five feet of snow, Brown was able to provide a haunting visual illustration of the unprecedented drought. He was joined by scientists taking a snowpack measurement on the date by which the state’s snowpack has usually reached its peak. The measurement on this particular April 1 was, of course, “zero,” the first time since 1940 that no snow had been measured there.
Although the state issued wimpy voluntary restrictions two weeks ago, and a $1 billion relief plan for those effected by the catastrophic drought, now the situation is even more dire, with snowpack across the state being reported at less than 5 percent the annual average.
Brown said today he wants to cut the state’s annual water use cut by 25 percent—that’s 5 percent more than the voluntary reduction’s goal. He also said that enforcement would be key, hinting that fines and legal recourse would be in place to punish water wasters.
Here’s a basic rundown of what California can expect, according to the Los Angeles Times:
—Require golf courses, cemeteries and other large landscaped spaces to reduce water consumption.—Replace 50 million square feet of lawn statewide with drought-tolerant landscaping as part of a partnership with local governments.—Create statewide rebate program to replace old appliance with more water- and energy-efficient ones.—Requires new homes to have water-efficient drip irrigation if developers want to use potable water for irrigation.—Bans the water of ornamental grass on public street medians.—Calls on water agencies to implement new pricing models that discourage excessive water use.
What’s still missing? Although these restrictions focus more on municipal water uses, agricultural reform is still needed. For the state to see the most drastic reduction of overall water use, there would have to be restrictions imposed upon on farms, which use 80 percent of the state’s water. But many farms are already planting fewer fields with more drought-tolerant crops, anticipating a dry summer.
This is progress, and a lot more ballsy than the voluntary restrictions from before. In honor of Brown, let’s all pledge to Jerry Brown our lawns this summer. [LA Times]
AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli
Hopefully this isn’t an April fools joke
“Just kidding! We’re actually hard at work squeezing the tears out of a thousand hippies so that me and the Lt. Governor can hit the links later!”
Honestly, it needs to be more. Here in Sacramento, where we have been (and will be further) hit hard.
I truly can’t stand the sight of everyone watering their weed lawns daily. Shit, my mother is one of them, and she just doesn’t get it, even though she’s seen what remains of our reservoir...the pond formerly known as Folsom Lake.
We should probably stop building homes, and malls like crazy too, but hey...the almighty dollar, right?
“>90% of California’s water footprint is associated with agricultural products. Meat and dairy products have especially large water footprints due to the amount of water-intensive feed required to raise the animals. 4% of California’s water footprint is associated with household water consumption.” (PDF link)
Excuse the pun, but Brown’s mandatory water restrictions are just a drop in the bucket.
Excuse the pun, but Brown’s mandatory water restrictions are just a drop in the bucket.
This keeps getting told and retold but it isn’t taking root. As long as you’re growing rice, alfalfa and almonds in an arid landscape, you’re not going to solve California’s water problem.
And yes, there are consequences for that. More expensive beef, being the best example. But, hey, reaping what we sew.
Alissa -
Thank you for pointing out that agriculture usage and waste is the really big issue here. So many people report on the 80% of the water going to agriculture then spend the rest of the article going on about how to cut residential usage to save the state (not sure what they aren’t understanding).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment-- or suggestions, particularly of topics and places you'd like to see covered