Translation from English

Friday, July 3, 2015

Sci American- We Are Producing 50 Per Cent More Solar Energy Than Previously Thought

Plugged In

Plugged In 

More than wires - exploring the connections between energy, environment, and our lives

U.S. Solar Is Producing 50 Percent More Electricity Than We Thought

| 
5


Photo by Oregon Department of Transportation of a solar panel being lifted into place used via Creative Commons license 2.0
Actual solar electricity production in the United States is 50% higher than previous estimates, according to new analysis by the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and kWh Analytics.
All told, analysts found that solar energy systems in the U.S. generated 30.4 million megawatt-hours (MWh) of electricity in the 12 months ending in March 2015. Three states - California, Arizona, and Hawaii – can now say that solar provides more than 5% of their total annual electricity demand.
The new estimate includes generation from behind-the-meter solar systems, which is not included in estimates produced by the Energy Information Administration (EIA). The EIA uses solar power generation information collected with their Form 923 survey, which only applies to utility-scale power plants that have more than 1,000 kW in solar generation capacity (i.e. are larger than 1,000 kWac). Given that the average solar PV system that you will find on the rooftops of houses in the U.S. has just 5 kWac of generation capacity, the electricity that they produce is not captured in EIA statistics. 
As a result, the EIA estimated that solar power produced 20.2 million MWh of electricity over the 12 months ending in March 2015 compared to the 30.4 million MWh published in the analysis from SEIA and kWh Analytics. 
According to Richard Matsui, Chief Executive Officer of kWh Analytics, the fact that their estimates are so much higher than the EIA’s is not surprising and is not an indicator of subterfuge:
“It’s an open secret among industry watchers that the EIA has been systematically underestimating energy output from solar. It’s not due to any intentional bias against solar itself; for decades, the EIA only collected data from utility-scale power plants because virtually all power plants were utility-scale. The explosion of distributed, rooftop solar in just a few years has created an enormous data management challenge for the EIA.”
In their calculations, Matsui and his colleagues took EIA’s utility-scale solar estimates and added behind-the-meter solar on top to produce total estimated solar production for each state. They estimated production levels for the smaller solar systems by tapping into kWh Analytics’s independent database of solar production data. This database supplied then with monthly “production factors” for both residential and non-residential solar systems. The SEIA then combined these data with detailed capacity information to estimate the total amount of electricity produced by all known behind-the-meter solar PV systems in each state.
Credit: SEIA, kWh Analytics

Credit: SEIA, kWh Analytics

As a result of this new analysis, Matsui hopes that he and his colleagues can work with the EIA to improve solar production estimates. They are already planning to regularly publish their findings as a type of index, to help in this endeavor.
“This new, national SEIA-kWh Analytics Solar Generation Index validates the tremendous progress that the American solar industry has made towards making solar a mainstream energy source,” said Matsui. He added that the index “also highlights the need for continued vigilance on the part of the solar industry to ensure that these power plants continue to perform reliably.”
The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.
Share this Article:

Comments

M1StavYJuly 1, 2015, 4:10 PM
If you want to compute the cost of this solar electricity, let me suggest my article, A Financial Worksheet for Computing the Cost (¢/kWh) of Solar Electricity Generated at Grid Connected Photovoltaic (PV) Generating Plants, was published in the Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, August, 2002, Vol. 124, Page 319. This article was one of the top 10 articles downloaded from the JSEE in the following months: November, 2006; December, 2007; February, 2008; October, 2008. Go to http://twitthis.com/v6ugnu
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
jerrydJuly 1, 2015, 7:03 PM
And this is the first yr more home, building, behind the meter solar was installed than utility units will make the EIA count off even more.
Good to see someone do the math.
For cheap solar do your own by buying kits, parts from sunelec/dmsolar, etc and local electrician to permit, install whatever you don't want to do, is under $2k/kw well shopped now..
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
ToeMossJuly 1, 2015, 10:34 PM
Its too bad that utilities are so resistant to paying (dollars and cents, not kWh banking) for all that power! 
Speaking of doing the math, the numbers in the 4th paragraph are off by 6 orders of magnitude.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
ToeMossJuly 1, 2015, 10:38 PM
Apologies, math is fine ;-)
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
SpoonmanWoS M1StavYJuly 2, 2015, 1:47 PM
Actually, if someone's going to look at your worksheet, they should keep in mind that any pricing that's from prior to 2014 is going to be egregiously skewed high. Solar pricing has been dropping consistently, with two 50% average drops since 2010 alone. 
And when you consider in grants and tax breaks, folks who thought solar was stupid just a few years ago are finding it a no-brainer now. Most people are seeing ROI of 5 years, 7 at the farthest outset. With a 25 year warranty, that's 18 years of free electricity.
There is no better time than right now. It's absurdly cheap, and no major paradigm shifts in the technology are on the horizon that will be commercially available at least for the next decade or so. So, if your concern is your installation will be outdated due to newer tech, you have no reason to worry. :)
Add in a Chevy Volt, like I did, and your energy usage is no longer a concern. :)
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please leave a comment-- or suggestions, particularly of topics and places you'd like to see covered