Translation from English

Monday, March 9, 2015

Scientific American- Global Warming to Go Crazy?

Global Warming Could Hit Rates Unseen in 1,000 Years

This finding comes from new research also showing that the Arctic, North America and Europe will be the first regions to transition to a new climate
hot sun


Historical records show temperatures have typically fluctuate up or down by about 0.2°F per decade over the past 1,000 years. But trends over the past 40 years have been decidedly up, with warming approaching 0.4°F per decade.  
Credit: Several Seconds via flickr
We are standing on the edge of a new world where warming is poised to accelerate at rates unseen for at least 1,000 years.
That’s the main finding of a paper published Monday in Nature Climate Change, which looked at the rate of temperature change over 40-year periods. The new research also shows that the Arctic, North America and Europe will be the first regions to transition to a new climate, underscoring the urgent need for adaptation planning.
“Essentially the world is entering a new regime where what is normal is going to continue to change and it’s changing at a rate than natural processes might not be able to keep up with,” Steven Smith, a researcher at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, said.
Historical records show temperatures have typically fluctuate up or down by about 0.2°F per decade over the past 1,000 years. But trends over the past 40 years have been decidedly up, with warming approaching 0.4°F per decade. That’s still within historical bounds of the past — but just barely.
By 2020, warming rates should eclipse historical bounds of the past 1,000 years — and likely at least 2,000 years — and keep rising. If greenhouse gas emissions continue on their current trend, the rate of warming will reach 0.7°F per decade and stay that high until at least 2100.
Global rates of temperature change in high and declining
greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Credit:Smith et al., 2015
Click here to enlarge
 
The northern hemisphere will be the first region to experience historically unprecedented warming. The Arctic, which is already the fastest warming part of the planet, will see temperatures rise 1.1°F per decade by 2040. North America and Europe will see slightly lower, though equally unprecedented, warming.
“With those high rates of change, there’s not going to be anything close to equilibrium,” Smith said, underscoring the profound potential impacts on both the natural world and society.
“The authors have demonstrated that we are currently headed into uncharted waters when it comes to the rate of climate change we are now seeing,” Michael Mann, who runs Penn State’s Earth System Science Center, said. “While past studies have focused on the unprecedented nature of the current warmth in the context of the past millennium, there has been less attention to the equally — if not more — critical issue of the rate of warming.”
The research comes on the heels of two recent papers — one which Mann co-authored — projecting that rapid warming is likely to resume in the next decade. That growing body of research has hypothesized that oceans have been stashing extra heat in their depths, leading to a slowdown in the rise of surface temperatures around the globe. But a coming shift in the Pacific trade winds could remove the cap holding that heat down and lead to increased surface warming.
Smith’s work didn’t specifically address this issue, but he said the global warming slowdown isn’t surprising given its comparatively short time frame. That’s partly why he chose to focus on 40-year intervals, which strip away year-to-year noise and represent an important time horizon for infrastructure planning.
“The normal will keep changing over time and that’s something we’ll have to expect and adapt to,” Smith said.
This article is reproduced with permission from Climate Central. The article was first published on March 9, 2015.
Share this Article:

Comments

keithwilliamsMarch 9, 2015, 4:56 PM
Good article on an interesting new report.
But... there are several typos and such ;)
"...and it’s changing at a rate than natural processes..."
"...temperatures have typically fluctuate up or down..."
"historical bounds of the past" - what other kinds of historical bounds are there?
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
dobermanmacleodMarch 9, 2015, 5:01 PM
What isn't well understood either by laymen or scientists is that it is the rate of warming that cause ecosystem collapse.
"Leemans and Eickhout (2004) found that adaptive capacity decreases rapidly with an increasing rate of climate change. Their study finds that five percent of all ecosystems cannot adapt more quickly than 0.1 °C per decade over time.
Forests will be among the ecosystems to experience problems first because their ability to migrate to stay within the climate zone they are adapted to is limited. If the rate is 0.3 °C per decade, 15 percent of ecosystems will not be able to adapt. If the rate should exceed 0.4 °C per decade, all ecosystems will be quickly destroyed, opportunistic species will dominate, and the breakdown of biological material will lead to even greater emissions of CO2. This will in turn increase the rate of warming."
Luckily, there is a very simple and super cheap way to immediately cool down the Earth: just add a little (more) sun dimming pollution to the air. If you don't like the results, just stop adding it, and it will quickly wash out of the air.
What isn't well understood is that what we must do is remove the excess carbon from the air and water. That would necessitate a clean, very very cheap, and super abundant energy technology. Luckily, one exists: LENR.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
belowzeroMarch 9, 2015, 5:06 PM
Lie Lies All Lies deliberately based on foolishness.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
dobermanmacleod dobermanmacleodMarch 9, 2015, 5:07 PM
"There are many companies now racing to bring Low Energy Nuclear Reaction products to the marketplace. One notable company is Solar Hydrogen Trends, which claims to have accidentally discovered a way to use LENR to produce hydrogen gas from water at the energy equivalent of producing pollution free oil for about $5.00 a barrel. Their hydrogen gas producing reactor has been independently tested by two well known companies, AirKinetics, Inc. and TRC Solutions. Both companies found that the reactor works as promised, and the TRC Solutions PDF report is quite shocking. Solar Hydrogen Trends claims that their technology can be scaled down to power automobiles or scaled up to power jet aircraft, ships, and entire cities."
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
AstrowatchMarch 9, 2015, 5:47 PM
What a load of data manipulated garbage. Who can believe anything printed about the climate anymore. Data points are removed and massaged to achieve a particular out come on one side or the other. Even my beloved NASA and NOAA were recently caught deleting data points. The political pressure applied to only tell one side of this story has become close to life and death. For the left it’s purely political and financial even to the point of being a religion to some. Most who work in the field of climate research will one day be viewed the same as Alchemist’s are now. As soon as the economics of this move more to science based on truth (and it always does eventually) they will be seen as the minion drones they are, who were rewarded with pats on the head for producing any manipulated story that advanced the cause. Truth in climate science has no real place as long as the money flows for their political objectives and increase their power to dictate our lives based on the lies.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please leave a comment-- or suggestions, particularly of topics and places you'd like to see covered