Translation from English

Thursday, February 19, 2015

Bleak Outlook for NYC Weather.... Scientific American

New York City Could See 6-Foot Sea Rise, Tripling of Heat Waves by 2100

If left unconstrained, global warming could wreak havoc on the Big Apple


According to the New York City Panel on Climate Change, an independent body composed of climate scientists, New York could see a 6-foot increase under a worst-case scenario. 
Credit: Nattu/Flickr
Heat waves and floods caused by climate change could mean disaster for the Big Apple's five boroughs by the end of the century, with sea levels now predicted by a new report to climb by as much as 6 feet by 2100.
According to the New York City Panel on Climate Change, an independent body composed of climate scientists, New York could see a 6-foot increase under a worst-case scenario that has been revised from previous estimates that 2 to 4 feet would be the maximum rise.
The report also marked a new estimate for how hot it could become within the next 80 or so years, with the panel projecting a temperature increase as much as 8.8 degrees Fahrenheit and a tripling in the frequency of heat waves by the 2080s in the city.
The report noted that temperatures in Central Park climbed at a rate of 0.3 F per decade from 1900 to 2013, totaling a 3.4 F rise, but the panel expects those figures to soar, with an increase of 4.1 to 5.7 F by the 2050s and 5.3 to 8.8 F by the 2080s.
The frequency of extreme precipitation is expected to jump, as well, with about 1½ times more events per year possible by the 2080s, the report said.
Coastal communities, like many on Staten Island and in low-lying Brooklyn and Queens, could be in particular jeopardy, with storms likely to alter local beaches and coastlines. To date, the city has already dumped 26,000 linear feet of sand along Staten Island's shorelines, for instance, but that number could pale in comparison with future adaptation needs, the report said.
The report is meant to help the city plan for climate change, including greenhouse gas emission reductions and making Staten Island's shores more resilient to storm surges and rising seas. New York has set a goal of cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by 2050, and a series of projects are underway to harden the city's infrastructure.
The report also attempts to prod the Federal Emergency Management Agency into revising its 2013 preliminary flood insurance rate maps to reflect the panel's conclusion that new projections will roughly double the areas likely to be affected by a 100-year flood.
Future damage could double
For the 500-year flood, new sea-level-rise estimates by 2100 increase the affected areas by 50 percent compared with FEMA's 2013 estimates, the panel said.
All this is why the report's authors are urging FEMA and the administration of Mayor Bill de Blasio (D) to heed the warnings contained in the exhaustive study.
Kim Knowlton, senior scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council and a co-author of the report's chapter on public health, said the report marks new territory because it extends previous research out to 2100 for the first time.
She added that FEMA in particular should take note lest New York strand as many people as were stranded when Superstorm Sandy hit in late 2012. Knowlton said as many as 300,000 people were "inundated" by Sandy outside FEMA'S flood-risk zone.
"These are better maps," she said of the maps in the panel's report. "They include more of the available science on climate change."
As for what comes next, Knowlton said she is optimistic de Blasio will take the projections seriously, despite some thought within the environmental community that the progressive mayor has been more readily drawn to issues like income inequality and race relations.
"What the city has on paper are fantastic plans," she said. "New York City is a world leader on [climate change]. This mayor has climate change in his sights."
Pressed further on whether de Blasio has made the environment a priority, Knowlton added, "Let's keep watching and helping and encouraging. We'll all be working together to both help and encourage this administration into action."
One area in which Knowlton would like to see added emphasis is urban heat island effects. She said the city can do much more to turn black rooftops white and change the built environment so less heat is radiated back into the atmosphere at night. She said these issues are essential to help low-income communities adapt.
Click here to read the report.
Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500
Share this Article:

Comments

ValjeanFebruary 19, 2015, 12:45 PM
We permeate the atmosphere with energy frequencies, aka: warmth, from our wireless communication tools and toys that puts a hot water bottle under the gas comforter we also create. It will especially reduce time cooling just a tad, compounding over repetition, giving the morning Sun a leg up on its heating. 
Denial doesn't make it go away. It needs to be included in the narrative.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
SuichenFebruary 19, 2015, 1:22 PM
Yawn, didnt realize SA was still pushing this fantasy, the global warming caused by humans so government grant paid scientists and politicians can get money for themselves, through their green companies. 
Yes I am a denier because I deny most religions, which is what global warming by CO2 is, when people have to use consensus to invent facts and ask if you "believe" in it. 
Still, what appears to be happening either natural or human influenced is the interglacial warming period is continuing as it normally does and this will cause sea levels to rise high enough for cities like new york to start considering what to do to mitigate what is coming. 
So this at least article, minus the global warming beliefs, is useful. Money, time and effort should be spent on mitigating effects like sea levels rising because it will eventually happen and it is far more efficient to mitigate for sea level rise than to spend the money to try to prevent what is a natural event. 
Even if this is human influenced or exacerbated, the cause is more likely the heat we produce in everything along with a combination of other factors none of which can be changed unless there is a plan to kill of 6 billion people and get the population back down to pre-industrial age levels. Yeah warmists thats right, the other thing that increased with the industrial age is the number of people and therefore the collective heat pollution we put out. A much better theory than your CO2 nonsense.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
CostasFebruary 19, 2015, 1:32 PM
So doing the math; they predict .85 inch per year, on average... or 8.5 in every ten years/ 17 inches after 20 yrs...
Can we go back a few years and see if any of this has happened already? Has the sea level at the Battery (Manhattan) gone up 8.5 inches since 2005?
or better yet, is the island where Miss Liberty stands gained 17 in of water level at the stones/ pier since 1995? I don't think so... well, let's ask the Dike builders in Holland, or the Airport authority of the island airports at Hong Kong, China or Kobe (Kansai), JP; or how about the Salt Ponds in San Francisco Bay, CA... have they had to build new dikes/ retaining walls in the past 20-30 yrs?
How high has the sea level risen at these easily confirmed locales? 0, oh okay then... 0 it is... sorry charlie... Your 85 yr future prediction is balanced against real/ verifiable sea level rise in the past 85 yrs... ouch.
PS: Please don't change the definition of Sea Level... let's use NOAA, not some sort of huge tsunami/ oh shiat a hurricane blew waves onto the beach... or the land is subsiding BS.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
lelandhauensteinFebruary 19, 2015, 1:47 PM
This article is High-larious. My God, what is wrong with these people? Everyone knows that God is in control. God created the Earth, the sun, the universe, and HEAVEN. Nothing can happen unless God allows it to happen. That is not to say that God makes bad things happen. That is Satan's work. Muslims are the Product of Satan. God did destroy Sodom and Gamorrah and Babylon. That is where the term Sodomy comes from, so now you know that God will destroy all QUEERS. So many people have abandoned God, and they think they control the universe. Or at least they want to be the ones who control the universe. But that is not going to happen. God is in Control. I am a scientist. I am a mechanical engineer. I am a Physicist. Anyone who understands Physics, knows that the sea level of the ocean is not going to rise 6 feet. Not now, not ever. God will destroy the earth one day, but not yet. When the prophesy is fulfilled, God will destroy the earth, but not until then. Jesus will return and he will reign 1000 years before God even thinks about destroying the earth. Global warming will not even be a memory by that time. So quit trying to scare people and let people live their lives in peace. God Bless you.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
tim543543February 19, 2015, 2:02 PM
Hurry it up. It's so cold here and there's too many people. NYC will be so much more awesome when it's tropical and the bases of abandoned skyscrapers are submerged.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
Paul0123February 19, 2015, 2:09 PM
"New York City Could see....", or it could not see.
Give me facts, not opinions. If in fact the science is settled the headline should read, "New York City Will see......" and we should stop spending money studying climate change. Spend the research dollars on solutions.
If we aren't sure, then say that. The headline should say, "Some Scientist believe that NYC could...., while other Scientist disagree...."
Don't be like the National Enquirer. Yes, Madonna may be having a baby for an alien from the planet Grog, but she also may not.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
ValjeanFebruary 19, 2015, 2:16 PM
Leland...God is in control...except, of course, when Satan decides to be in control.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
Fact CheckerFebruary 19, 2015, 2:26 PM
Think reflective glass may be raising Central Park's temps? How about the rapidly expanded use of concrete? If you post the increase of lawyers to the rise in temperatures, you'll find a very strong correlation. Therefore, lawyers cause global warming.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
GeorgeWFebruary 19, 2015, 2:29 PM
It's just too funny. These same folk denying the global climate are the ones who built in lower Mississippi regions like New Orleans and then complained when the dykes failed. "We don't get no hurricanes here!" or "Dykes will protect us!"
We can argue to the ends of the Earth whether people are causing a faster change, but since the last glaciation it's been getting warmer. Just look out your window: Is there a glacier there? Historically, when there's been more CO2 in the air, it's been warmer. Or, we can even say: When it's been warmer there's been more CO2 in the air. Most dating methods can't distinguish which came first, but we do know CO2 traps heat, and it's pretty easy to test locally, and not a stretch to say adding more to the air we breath is helping it get warmer.
In terms of tidal gauges being predictors. The Pacific Coast near Cascadia has risen and fallen meters in the past few hundred to thousands of years. So the fact is a coast might be rising at the same rate as a climate induced tidal rise. Just as some coasts are known to be sinking faster than the rise - a double whammy.
On the denial side, especially the religious among you, you all can chose to believe or not believe. But please, don't let your dogma interfere with the ability of others to help the rest of us where they can.
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
Anchovy_Rancher GeorgeWFebruary 19, 2015, 2:46 PM
"Dykes?" 
On the illiterate amongst "you"...
Report as Abuse | 
 
Link to This
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
risk free title graphic
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
cover imageSubscribe Now

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please leave a comment-- or suggestions, particularly of topics and places you'd like to see covered