Chile Rejects $8 Billion Dam Project in Patagonia
Chile's government rejected an $8 billion proposal to dam Patagonian
rivers to meet the country's growing energy demands, handing a victory
to environmentalists who praised Tuesday's ruling as a landmark moment.
A ministerial commission rejected the HidroAysen plan, which would have
tamed two of the world's wildest rivers and built more than 1,000 miles
(1,600 kilometers) of power lines to supply energy to central Chile.
After a three-hour meeting, Chile's ministers of agriculture, energy,
mining, economy and health voted unanimously to reject the project. The
committee "decided to side with complaints presented by the community,"
Environment Minister Pablo Badenier told reporters. "As of now, the
hydroelectric project has been rejected."
The project would have built five dams on the Baker and Pascua rivers in
Aysen, a mostly roadless region of southern Patagonia where rainfall is
nearly constant and rivers plunge from Andean glaciers to the Pacific
Ocean through green valleys and fjords.
Patricio Rodrigo, executive secretary of the Patagonia Defense Council,
called the decision "the greatest triumph of the environmental movement
in Chile."
It "marks a turning point, where an empowered public demands to be heard
and to participate in the decisions that affect their environment and
their lives," Rodrigo said.
Chile is strapped for energy, but most Chileans opposed HidroAysen, and protests against it at times turned violent.
"This is truly amazing news," said Margarita Baigorria Cruces, a local
resident of Aysen who led a petition campaign against the project for
activist group Avaaz.
"We were dreaming and hoping this would happen. We won't be condemned to
drink gold: water is our treasure and this historical victory was meant
to be sooner or later. The last thing you lose is hope."
HidroAysen executives had promised that the Aysen region would get
cheaper energy, jobs, scholarships and millions in infrastructure,
including seaports and airports.
But people in the sparsely populated area remained divided. About three
dozen families would have been relocated, but the dams would have
drowned 14,000 acres (5,700 hectares), required carving clear-cuts
through forests, and eliminating whitewater rapids and waterfalls that
attract ecotourism. They also could have destroyed habitat for the
endangered Southern Huemul deer: Fewer than 1,000 of the diminutive
animals, a national symbol, are believed to exist.
With its energy-intensive mining industry demanding more power, experts
say Chile must triple its current 18,000-megawatt capacity in just 15
years, despite having no domestic oil or natural gas resources. The dams
were planned to generate a total of 2,750 megawatts, almost a third of
central Chile's current needs, within 12 years.
Before she was elected last year, President Michelle Bachelet had said
the HidroAysen plan was not viable. She announced last month that she
instead would tackle Chile's energy crunch by building up alternative
energy sources and terminals for liquefied natural gas.
The HidroAysen joint venture is 51 percent owned by European energy
generator Endesa and 49 percent owned by the Chilean company Colbun SA.
Endesa is a Spanish subsidiary of the Italian energy company Enel SpA.
The company can appeal the decision before an environmental court, and
analysts expect a long legal battle. The HidroAysen venture was not
immediately available for comment.
——
Associated Press writers Eva Vergara in Santiago, Chile and Michael
Warren in Buenos Aires, Argentina contributed to this report.
——
Luis Andres Henao on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LuisAndresHenao
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment-- or suggestions, particularly of topics and places you'd like to see covered