23 April 2014
Last updated at 09:13 ET
nightingales, larks and some 60 other species all have their place in the canon.
Such references have inspired bird lovers for centuries.
So much so that in 1890, a German immigrant named Eugene Schieffelin decided it would be a great idea to introduce as many of Shakespeare's birds as possible to North America.
One cold winter's day he released 60 starlings into New York's Central Park in the hope they would start breeding.
Unfortunately, they did.
And they are now such a nuisance they are one of the few bird species unprotected by law.
"Starlings are lean and mean. In the industry they're often called feathered bullets," says Michael Begier, National Coordinator for the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Airports Wildlife Hazards Program.
"They're a particular problem at airports because they flock in very large numbers, and compared to other birds their bodies are very dense. They are about 27% more dense than a herring gull which is a much larger bird."
When a flock of starlings strikes an airplane the effects can be devastating. In 1960 they caused the most deadly bird strike in US aviation history.
The birds flew into the engines of a plane as it took off from Boston's Logan Airport, and it crashed into the harbour, killing 62 people on board.
Starlings also cost US agriculture an estimated $1bn (£595m) a year in damage to crops - particularly fruit trees.
They can even cause milk production to drop at dairy farms because they steal the grain being fed to cows.
"What makes the starlings particularly insidious is that they pick out the finest quality grain, which causes a reduction in dairy output because the cows aren't getting the nutrition they need," says George Linz, a research wildlife biologist at the USDA National Wildlife Research Center.
"Very often farmers don't realise what's happening."
Ironically, starlings are only mentioned once by Shakespeare - in Henry IV Part I.
Hotspur is in rebellion against the King and is thinking of ways to torment him. In Act 1 Scene III he fantasizes about teaching a starling to say "Mortimer" - one of the king's enemies.
"Nay, I'll have a starling shall be taught to speak nothing but Mortimer, and give it to him to keep his anger still in motion," Shakespeare wrote.
"As with everything, Shakespeare's imagination seems to know no boundaries," says Drew Lichtenberg, literary associate for the Shakespeare Theater Company, which is currently staging Henry IV Parts I and II.
"He uses birds to express the depth of romantic feeling in Romeo and Juliet. He uses them to express the screech of night owls in the Scottish Play [Macbeth] and King Lear. He uses them for every dramatic purpose."
Lichtenberg says people tend to impose their own views on Shakespeare's works, which may be one reason why Victorian bird enthusiasts wanted to use his texts to justify releasing non-native species.
A bird enthusiast would find what they want to hear in Shakespeare, "and a bird hater would find just as much grist for the mill", he says.
"Most of the introductions that were made by these societies
failed miserably," says Kevin McGowan of the Laboratory of Ornithology
at Cornell University.
"But some of them stuck and were very successful - the most obvious being the house sparrow and the European starling."
Starlings nest in holes, which offer one of the safest environments to lay eggs because they are generally inaccessible to predators.
"But there aren't that many holes out there so the competition is intense," says McGowan. "And European starlings are really good competitors. They're smallish birds, about half the size of a fist. But they weigh half as much again relative to other birds - and it seems to be all muscle.
"And that's the single biggest problem. They out-compete all the native hole-nesters."
Scientists say there's a correlation between the increased numbers of starlings and a decline in native species such as the red headed woodpecker, purple martin and bluebird.
But they're not entirely certain that starlings are the cause, and starling numbers are also declining slightly - although not significantly enough to make a difference in the impact they have on the environment.
In 2012 - the latest figures available - the USDA killed almost 1.5 million starlings by shooting and trapping.
"But I would say we've had zero effect on the overall population," says Linz.
So does anybody other than Shakespeare and misguided 19th Century bird lovers have any liking of starlings?
"One can make a case that they really shouldn't be here - but starlings are really cool birds," says McGowan. "They are these beautiful iridescent creatures with purple and green across the chest and throat. And they have really cool songs because they throw in mimicry of other species."
Indeed, Mozart had a pet starling which he purchased in 1784 and reportedly buried with great ceremony three years later.
At least somebody was sad to see one go.
The birds of Shakespeare cause US trouble
It's William Shakespeare's 450th birthday - but in the US not everybody is celebrating his legacy.
Birds feature prominently in Shakespeare's plays and poetry.
Choughs, wrens, cormorants, owls,nightingales, larks and some 60 other species all have their place in the canon.
Such references have inspired bird lovers for centuries.
So much so that in 1890, a German immigrant named Eugene Schieffelin decided it would be a great idea to introduce as many of Shakespeare's birds as possible to North America.
One cold winter's day he released 60 starlings into New York's Central Park in the hope they would start breeding.
Unfortunately, they did.
Continue reading the main story
"The cormorant is a voracious fishing bird," says Shakespeare Theater Company's Drew Lichtenberg. In Coriolanus there's reference to the "cormorant belly of Rome".
Sometimes Shakespeare uses birds because their names conjure an image or simply sound interesting. In The Tempest one character says he can "make a chough of as deep chat".
After Romeo and Juliet consummate their marriage they hear a bird singing. They argue over whether it's a nightingale, a bird of the night, or a lark which means it's morning and Romeo must leave.
"When the wind is southerly I can tell a hawk from a handsaw," says Hamlet, seemingly describing how he can feign madness when it suits him.
In Macbeth, Shakespeare turns to birds of the night, says Lichtenberg. After the murder of Duncan, Lady Macbeth hears the screech of an owl and never regains her sanity. It was the owl that shrieked, the fatal bellman which gives the sternest goodnight.
The Bard's birds
"The cormorant is a voracious fishing bird," says Shakespeare Theater Company's Drew Lichtenberg. In Coriolanus there's reference to the "cormorant belly of Rome".
Sometimes Shakespeare uses birds because their names conjure an image or simply sound interesting. In The Tempest one character says he can "make a chough of as deep chat".
After Romeo and Juliet consummate their marriage they hear a bird singing. They argue over whether it's a nightingale, a bird of the night, or a lark which means it's morning and Romeo must leave.
"When the wind is southerly I can tell a hawk from a handsaw," says Hamlet, seemingly describing how he can feign madness when it suits him.
In Macbeth, Shakespeare turns to birds of the night, says Lichtenberg. After the murder of Duncan, Lady Macbeth hears the screech of an owl and never regains her sanity. It was the owl that shrieked, the fatal bellman which gives the sternest goodnight.
The US is now home to an
estimated 200 million European starlings. Thickset and pugnacious,
starlings are the bruisers of the avian world.
"Starlings are lean and mean. In the industry they're often called feathered bullets," says Michael Begier, National Coordinator for the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Airports Wildlife Hazards Program.
"They're a particular problem at airports because they flock in very large numbers, and compared to other birds their bodies are very dense. They are about 27% more dense than a herring gull which is a much larger bird."
When a flock of starlings strikes an airplane the effects can be devastating. In 1960 they caused the most deadly bird strike in US aviation history.
The birds flew into the engines of a plane as it took off from Boston's Logan Airport, and it crashed into the harbour, killing 62 people on board.
Starlings also cost US agriculture an estimated $1bn (£595m) a year in damage to crops - particularly fruit trees.
They can even cause milk production to drop at dairy farms because they steal the grain being fed to cows.
"What makes the starlings particularly insidious is that they pick out the finest quality grain, which causes a reduction in dairy output because the cows aren't getting the nutrition they need," says George Linz, a research wildlife biologist at the USDA National Wildlife Research Center.
"Very often farmers don't realise what's happening."
Ironically, starlings are only mentioned once by Shakespeare - in Henry IV Part I.
Hotspur is in rebellion against the King and is thinking of ways to torment him. In Act 1 Scene III he fantasizes about teaching a starling to say "Mortimer" - one of the king's enemies.
"Nay, I'll have a starling shall be taught to speak nothing but Mortimer, and give it to him to keep his anger still in motion," Shakespeare wrote.
"As with everything, Shakespeare's imagination seems to know no boundaries," says Drew Lichtenberg, literary associate for the Shakespeare Theater Company, which is currently staging Henry IV Parts I and II.
"He uses birds to express the depth of romantic feeling in Romeo and Juliet. He uses them to express the screech of night owls in the Scottish Play [Macbeth] and King Lear. He uses them for every dramatic purpose."
Lichtenberg says people tend to impose their own views on Shakespeare's works, which may be one reason why Victorian bird enthusiasts wanted to use his texts to justify releasing non-native species.
A bird enthusiast would find what they want to hear in Shakespeare, "and a bird hater would find just as much grist for the mill", he says.
Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote
Dr Kevin McGowan Laboratory of Ornithology at Cornell UniversityOne can make a case that they really shouldn't be here - but starlings are really cool birds”
Eugene Schieffelin was a member
of the American Acclimatization Society, which aimed to introduce plants
and birds from the old world of Europe to create comfort and
familiarity in the new nation of America.
"But some of them stuck and were very successful - the most obvious being the house sparrow and the European starling."
Starlings nest in holes, which offer one of the safest environments to lay eggs because they are generally inaccessible to predators.
"But there aren't that many holes out there so the competition is intense," says McGowan. "And European starlings are really good competitors. They're smallish birds, about half the size of a fist. But they weigh half as much again relative to other birds - and it seems to be all muscle.
"And that's the single biggest problem. They out-compete all the native hole-nesters."
Scientists say there's a correlation between the increased numbers of starlings and a decline in native species such as the red headed woodpecker, purple martin and bluebird.
But they're not entirely certain that starlings are the cause, and starling numbers are also declining slightly - although not significantly enough to make a difference in the impact they have on the environment.
In 2012 - the latest figures available - the USDA killed almost 1.5 million starlings by shooting and trapping.
"But I would say we've had zero effect on the overall population," says Linz.
So does anybody other than Shakespeare and misguided 19th Century bird lovers have any liking of starlings?
"One can make a case that they really shouldn't be here - but starlings are really cool birds," says McGowan. "They are these beautiful iridescent creatures with purple and green across the chest and throat. And they have really cool songs because they throw in mimicry of other species."
Indeed, Mozart had a pet starling which he purchased in 1784 and reportedly buried with great ceremony three years later.
At least somebody was sad to see one go.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment-- or suggestions, particularly of topics and places you'd like to see covered