The ultimate guide to debunking blizzard-based climate change denial

Next time someone tells you that snowy weather means global warming isn't real, you'll know exactly how to respond VIDEO

Lindsay Abrams Follow

Video Links:

http://www.salon.com/2014/02/13/the_ultimate_guide_to_debunking_blizzard_based_climate_change_denial/

Topics: Video, Climate Change, Global Warming, Winter, blizzards, Weather, Sustainability News

Vehicles slowly make their way on a snow-covered Alabama state Route 35, on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2014, in Fort Payne, Ala. Residents woke to a blanket of snow that was expected to continue throughout the morning hours. (AP Photo/Hal Yeager) (Credit: AP)

The southern U.S. has been paralyzed by a historic ice storm, and the northeast is well on its way to another foot-plus of snow. If all that weren’t bad enough, the climate trolls are coming out.
This time, top honors goes to the Federalist, which can’t get over the irony of Senate Democrats scheduling a hearing on global warming right as a blizzard is expected to hit D.C. In fact, there’s good reason to believe that global climate change is linked to extreme weather like this, but arguing that is an advanced move. Demonstrating that cold and snowy weather in no way disproves global warming? Anyone can do that.

Below, three tried-and-true retorts to climate deniers. You can try a fast and simple zinger, back it up with a blunt chart or, if you’re tired of explaining, let one of these smart videos do it for you. Why not try a healthy combination of all three? And, ss a last resort, there’s always the weather report for Australia.
The zingers
-SkepticalScience, a reliable font of detailed information, also breaks it down into this one-sentence explanation:
“A local cold day has nothing to do with the long-term trend of increasing global temperatures.”
-Mother Jones’ Tim Murphy is something of an evangelical for the cause:

In one sentence: "Warming things up means the atmosphere can hold more moisture." Science! http://t.co/0jMUBSsoVK
— Tim Murphy (@timothypmurphy) February 12, 2014

-Princeton University climate scientist Michael Oppenheimer sums up the current reality of climate change:
“Shorter snow season, less snow overall, but the occasional knockout punch. That’s the new world we live in.”
-And, courtesy of the NRDC, a simple analogy:
“The effect of global warming on our climate is not unlike the effect of steroids on an athlete’s performance: It supercharges storms; it causes abnormal conditions like drought and heat and ultimately, it causes damage.”
The charts
Here, data from the NOAA and NASA clearly shows that global temperatures have been higher than average for the past 37 consecutive years:

This one, courtesy of Skeptical Science, plots the annual numbers of record high maximum temperatures (the red dots) along with the record lows (the blue dots), averaged over the U.S. That black line — the one that doesn’t line up with what’s plotted — shows where the dots would theoretically lie should no global warming or cooling be taking place. You can see how, over time, we’ve ended up with more record highs than lows:

Heavy precipitation (Oppenheimer’s “occasional knockout punch”) is also becoming more common, as this next map from the Global Change Research Research program shows:

As to the less overall snow, SkepticalScience has this nice breakdown of seasonal and annual snowfall in the Northern Hemisphere. It demonstrates how earlier and more extensive melting in the spring and summer more than makes up for the smaller increase in fall and winter precipitation. The total decline in snow extent between 1972 and 2010 was a full 1.3 million square kilometers:

This last one’s actually a comic, courtesy of the fantastic XKCD, but it’s got a chart drawn in. And it once again makes the important point that extreme cold is becoming less and less common:

The videos
Chris Hayes, an ironic sparkle in his eyes, asks climate scientist Michael Mann how it’s possible for snow and global warning to be happening at the same time. His reply: “Well we climate scientists actually have a technical term for this phenomenon. It’s called winter” (you can file that one away with the other zingers):

Peter Sinclair of ClimateCrocks delves deeper into the science with this 2009 video response to that infallible argument: ”I looked outside, and it was snowing, therefore, there is no climate change”:
The White House released this “propaganda” in honor of the infamous polar vortex, which received a fair amount of trolling. Featuring John Holdren, President Obama’s science advisor, it’s notable both for its acknowledgement that man-made climate change could actually be responsible for patterns extreme cold, and for its reminder that no single weather event can either prove or disprove global warming:

Lindsay Abrams is an assistant editor at Salon, focusing on all things sustainable. Follow her on Twitter @readingirl, email labrams@salon.com.
More Lindsay Abrams.