The subject of the latest debunked Obamacare horror story is finally talking, and of course it's to Fox News.
Julie Boonstra is a Michigan resident with leukemia, and she appeared
in an Americans For Prosperity ad against Democratic Senate candidate
Rep. Gary Peters, saying that Obamacare made her cancer treatment
unaffordable because of out of pocket spending. Subsequent fact
checking, though, found that her monthly premium payments were
essentially cut in half, and the limits the law imposes on out of pocket
expenses means that at worse, she'd break even between those costs and
her premium saving. The ad also implied she lost access to her doctor,
though fact checking determined that her doctor is included in the plan
she picked on the exchange.
So with no real basis to the story she presented in the ad, how does
Boonstra respond? The only way she can, the way Republicans always go, playing the victim.
If Boonstra is a victim, she's the willing victim of the Koch brothers and AFP who would ultimately throw her to the wolves. But if she hates the law that much, fine, whatever. What she's doing, though, jeopardizes every other cancer patient in the nation.
"They're not scaring me. Cancer scares me," she said. "I battle cancer every day. They're not going to intimidate me." [...] "Under my old policy, I knew what I could afford every single month because I wasn't hit with extra charges. Now I don't know what I have to pay month to month," she said. "Leukemia tests are extremely expensive."Just to set the record straight, pointing out factual inconsistencies is not intimidation. No one is saying that Boonstra isn't experiencing real angst over having to change health insurance in the middle of her fight with cancer. No one is diminishing her fight with cancer, they're just pointing out some basic truths which show that her story just doesn't add up. And as Brian Beutler points out, if the Koch brothers achieved what they're trying to with this and other ads—repeal—then she would really become a victim. The protections she now has under this law—to never be kicked off her health insurance plan, to never have to worry about having health coverage because of her leukemia, having her annual out of pocket expenses limited, and never having to worry about reaching an annual or lifetime cap where her coverage is just cut off—would be gone if the campaign she's participating in succeeds. Which is, yes, insane.
If Boonstra is a victim, she's the willing victim of the Koch brothers and AFP who would ultimately throw her to the wolves. But if she hates the law that much, fine, whatever. What she's doing, though, jeopardizes every other cancer patient in the nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment-- or suggestions, particularly of topics and places you'd like to see covered