US & World
In Wake of James Foley Beheading Video, Journalists Rush to Self-Censor
Just as quickly, journalists realized that this social media dissemination is exactly what extremist group the Islamic State (formerly known as ISIS/ISIL) had hoped for.
I do not believe in censorship but I believe those who promote #ISIS filth must be stopped, and that gives sufficient grounds for censorshipSocial media can seem like a runaway freight train at times, barreling forward with little control or consideration about its impact. The images of Foley will almost certainly be found in perpetuity in the dark corners of the Internet. However, most media outlets and journalists declined to share the graphic video or photos, recognizing that word was already spreading without them.
— Ruwayda Mustafah (@RuwaydaMustafah) August 19, 2014
The video of ISIS beheading a man they say is US journalist James Foley is absolutely dark, gruesome. Not sharing. No one should share.
— grasswire (@grasswire) August 19, 2014
Please do not retweet or share the video of James Foley. That's what IS wants. Don't give it to them.For its part, CNN chose to show stills from the video, a move that drew criticism. (In its coverage, Mashable published two still images from the video.)
— B. Allen-Ebrahimian (@BethanyAllenEbr) August 19, 2014
Come *on*, CNN, do not air imagery from the propaganda video.
— Spencer Ackerman (@attackerman) August 19, 2014
Unbelievable. CNN showing stills from Isis Foley videoExtremist groups such as the Islamic State use social media as an easy way to sidestep the checks employed by media organizations to stop the spread of propaganda. Vice reported in April that British jihadists in Syria had ramped up the use of social media to spread their message, and intimidate opponents. Vice said the posts are mostly in English, with some videos showing people speaking with a London accent. The man who allegedly kills Foley in the video posted on Tuesday was also noted by many to have a London accent.
— Matt Wells (@MatthewWells) August 19, 2014
Twitter and YouTube took steps to stem the flow of graphic images from the Foley video. Zaid Benjamin, a journalist for Arabic-language radio station Radio Sawa, who tweeted a screenshot from the video, had his account briefly suspended by Twitter.
My twitter account was suspended for a short period of time. Lost 30k followers. Thanks for those who asked.YouTube later took down one version of the video, citing its terms on violent images.
— Zaid Benjamin (@zaidbenjamin) August 19, 2014
Despite this censorship, some journalists believe the video should be seen as a brutal reminder of what has been going on in parts of the Middle East. The Islamic State has been accused of killing hundreds of civilians, many by beheading, Al Jazeera reported.
James Foley video is astonishingly painful, but it should be seen, it shows what we're facing. Censorship never the answerThe Islamic State is not exactly invisible online, with some journalists keeping an eye on known social media accounts. Following the release of the Foley video, some of these accounts appeared to be leaving Twitter to avoid being banned.
— Joel Taylor (@JoelTaylorMetro) August 19, 2014
Looks like pro-ISIS accounts may be deactivating their accounts on purpose to avoid bans h/t @ArtWendeley pic.twitter.com/q00YnqPcKW
— Brown Moses (@Brown_Moses) August 19, 2014
Backlash against the militants developed quickly, with
#ISISMediaBlackout trending shortly after the video's release. The
hashtag logged more than 3,800 tweets in less than two hours, according to analytics firm Topsy.
"Describe their crimes, don't publish their propaganda." #ISISmediaBlackout
— Hend (@LibyaLiberty) August 19, 2014
Have something to add to this story? Share it in the comments.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment-- or suggestions, particularly of topics and places you'd like to see covered