According to some, the Oscar-winning animated kids’ film is not the
charming, comedic musical critics have universally praised, but rather
Hollywood’s latest sinister venture in gay propaganda. Moreover,
Disney’s latest blockbuster, based on a Hans Christian Anderson story,
is not an isolated assault on the civilized world’s core principle of
heterosexuality, but one of the countless (10, if we’re counting)
examples of seemingly child-friendly cultural and social entities that
are actually gay conversion tools. Let’s take a look at the dangers the
Christian Right has alerted us to.
In her
post of over 4,000 words, Skaggs fails to actually prove her point, but
she does make creative leaps. She writes that “Elsa has a great power
that she has been taught by her parents from the time she was a child,
is not publicly acceptable and that she must fear its expression, at all
cost, thus hide it from people, even her own sister who could be hurt
by it—even killed. Shame is at the core of Elsa’s feelings about her
magical powers: same-sex attraction.”
So, whenever you
feel something that isn’t socially acceptable, that something is your
gayness. I’m not sure exactly how homosexuality could kill relatives,
like Elsa’s sister, but apparently it does. Heart attack from shock, I
guess? Death by dehydration following non-stop vomiting? But anyway…
2. Hot for Harry Potter. If only
Frozen were the only kids’ entertainment attempting to turn your kids gay. But, alas, Harry Potter was making gay cool long before
Frozen was
even a twinkle in Satan’s eye. Now, you probably already know that the
books, written by J.K. Rowlings, were pro-satanic and advocated all
sorts of
witchcraft.
But you may have missed that’s it’s also propaGAYnda. Though the gays
are notoriously sneaky in their messaging—one of the many things that
make them so dangerous—the Harry Potter campaign was unique because
author J.K. Rowling was atypically straightforward and honest when she
officially
announced“Dumbledore is gay.”
Berit Kjos, a Christian author who rejects Rowling and the Christians who read her,
was ecstaticabout
this smoking gun: “My first response was, `Thank you, Lord,’ because
this helps us show others that these books should not be used in the
churches to illustrate Christianity. Because Dumbledore has been
revealed as a homosexual, it helps me communicate my message… It helps
Christians who are concerned about the use of Harry Potter books in
churches, because it makes it very clear that these books are not
intended to be Christian, that Rowling isn’t speaking as a Christian.
She has introduced values that are contrary to the biblical message.”
Kjos
wasn’t the only one praying that the outing of Dumbledore would serve
as a wakeup call. Laura Mallory, a mother of four from Georgia who
worked to get Harry Potter banned from school libraries
said,
“My prayer is that parents would wake up, that the subtle way this is
presented as harmless fantasy would be exposed for what it really is: a
subtle indoctrination into anti-Christian values…. A homosexual
lifestyle is a harmful one. That’s proven, medically.”
Putting
aside the lack of medical proof suggesting homosexuality is harmful,
let’s look at the proof that the books are, indeed, gay propaganda. As
someone
wrote on
Kuro5hin.org, “a community of people who like to think,” Harry Potter
is “about a boy who lives in a cupboard (i.e. ‘in the closet’). His Aunt
and Uncle are ashamed of him because his parents were quite eccentric
(i.e. ‘flaming’) and they are deeply concerned and afraid that he will
turn out just like them.”
So, Harry was the spawn of a
flaming homosexual-heterosexual union. Interesting. That’s not all: ”On
his 11th birthday (i.e. roughly at the onset of puberty), the boy
discovers that he is actually a ‘wizard’, different in both style and
substance from normal people, or ‘muggles’ (i.e. ‘breeders’). The boy is
groomed into his new existence by a large, hairy bear of a man who
shows Harry a hidden underground community of ‘wizards’ living right
under the noses of the general population (i.e. the gay subculture).
Harry’s first trip to this subculture involves traveling through ‘Diagon
Alley’, a play on the word diagonally (i.e. not straight).” If the last
sentence doesn’t prove how diagonal Harry’s character is and how
pro-diagonal the books are, I don’t know what will.
Perhaps
this? In her understated plea “Christian Parents: Stop Trusting Harry
Potter” Linda Harvey, the president of “Mission America, which monitors
both the homosexual agenda directed at children as well as paganism
among American youth” writes, “But Dumbledore is a made-up figure, and
as such, he’s up for critique, review and remodeling. Why make him
‘gay,’ one wonders? Why now? An agenda seems to be lurking. The link
between pagan/occult spirituality and outlaw sexuality has always been
strong, one more reason to keep impressionable kids away from the
increasingly weird genre of ‘fantasy’ books and movies. These spirits
are real and seek to intrigue, deceive and sidetrack the children handed
to them. And that’s exactly what we are doing—handing them our precious
children, believing there’s no harm.”
3. Penguins. The
gay agenda folks do not limit themselves to film or television. One of
their most dangerous recruitment tools is a children’s book (with a
pretty racy title): And Tango Makes Three. The book is based on
the true story of Roy and Silo, two male Chinstrap (I don’t know what
this is, but it sounds pretty gay to me) penguins, who lived in the
Central Park Zoo in the very gay city of New York. Zookeepers observed
that Roy and Silo had made a nest together and were seemingly trying to
hatch a rock, which looked like a penguin egg. So, what did these
zookeepers do after observing this deviant behavior? Did they separate
the two? Did they initiate ex-gay-conversion therapy? No. They enabled
the behavior by giving them the egg of another penguin couple, Porkey
and Betty, who had two eggs they could not hatch at once. Roy and Silo
took turns sitting on top of the egg until it hatched a female chick,
which the zookeepers named Tango, after the very hedonist, sexual dance.
Co-writer and senior penguin keeper Rob Gramzay
claims,
“We wrote the book to help parents teach children about same-sex parent
families. It’s no more an argument in favor of human gay relationships
than it is a call for children to swallow their fish whole or sleep on
rocks.” But, conveniently, the writers failed to follow up on what
ultimately happened to Roy and Silo. After a six-year-long sinful
relationship with Roy, Silo was able to come around to the light side.
He left Roy for Scrappy, a female penguin. The two forged a healthy
heterosexual union, as god designed.
Candi Cushman, education analyst for
Focus on the Family Action,
calls the book, “very misleading”: “it’s a very disingenuous,
inaccurate way to promote a political agenda to little kids.” The
breakup did occur after the book was published. But surely, responsible
children’s book writers would have written a sequel like
And Scrappy Makes God Happy.
Sadly, Tango was obviously damaged by being raised by two penguin
daddies and she entered into an unhealthy lesbian-penguin relationship
with another female named Tanuzi.
Luckily, this outrageous attempt at indoctrination was met with protest from the right.
Between2006 and 2010
Tango Makes Three was
number one on the American Library Association’s “Ten Most Challenged
Books” list. Across the nation, righteous parents have attempted to ban
the book.
4. Fox News!? Though not all children watch Fox News, many of their parents do. A
report called
“Unfair, Unbalanced and Afraid: Fox News’ Growing Pro-Homosexual Bias
and the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA),”
released by the just-as-loony-as-it-sounds website America’s Survival,
Inc. explains how the media company is endangering our children: “With
pro-‘gay’ attitudes dominating newsrooms, few journalists seem willing
to pursue stories that might offend America’s powerful and well-funded
homosexual activist lobby. This would include investigating how
escalating ‘gay power’ represented by pro-LGBT ‘nondiscrimination’ laws
subject even very young children to inappropriate pro-homosexual
‘lessons’ in school, thus undermining both children’s innocence and
parental rights.”
Fox News is a particularly dangerous
harbor of homosexual propaganda because people expect so much more from
it: “Why concentrate on Fox? Because Fox News has inordinate influence
with conservative Americans and with the Republican Party—which is also
retrenching its opposition to ‘gay rights.’ And because Fox holds itself
to a high standard of being ‘Fair and Balanced’— i.e., not sharing the
notorious bias of the dominant liberal media.”
How do we
know the homosexual agenda has managed to infiltrate Fox News? The
dearth of coverage of ex-gays who were converted into straightdom is one
telltale sign: “Homosexual activists are desperate to keep happy FORMER
homosexuals out of the media. Why doesn’t Fox’s Sean Hannity or ‘Fox
& Friends’ do a segment on happy ex-‘gays’?” Answer: because they
are taking orders from these desperate Homosexual activists. More proof?
“Pushing
Sean Hannity out of the 9:00 p.m. slot, to
make way for pro-homosexual advocate Megyn Kelly, is another sign of the channel’s left-ward drift and decline.”
I
guess Hannity, who caves to gay pressure by not having at least one
ex-gay guest per episode, is better than FOG (Friend of Gays) Megyn
Kelly, who once actually used the phrase “marriage equality” (instead of
gay marriage) on LIVE NATIONAL TV! Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly
claims that
the whole gay marriage “thing” will cause unions with a “goat,” “duck,”
“turtle,” and “dolphin.” And Fox News Radio’s Todd Starnes is
obsessed with President Obama’s alleged homosexual relationship with Reggie Love. And Shannon Bream
had a
special segment called “The Fight for Faith” in which she warned that
anti-discrimination ordinances were “reverse discrimination” and a
“First Amendment rights issue.” And Tucker Carlson does consider laws
mandating that businesses serve gay customers “fascism.” And Megyn Kelly
herself does
fear that
if businesses can’t discriminate against gay people, Catholic Churches
will be forced to perform gay weddings. But none of that can outweigh
the pro-gay bias of Fox News. It’s that bad.
5. T&A TSA.Not
surprisingly, the government is part of the gay recruitment agenda.
Now, many conservatives are hip to the way the Transportation Security
Agency (TSA) combines scanning, pat-downs and non-discrimination
policies to subject travelers to homosexual inspection. For instance,
Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality
(AFTAH), asked, “Is it fair to travelers who may end up getting ‘groped’
by homosexual TSA agents who are secretly getting turned on through the
process….The reality is, most traveling men would not want Barney Frank
to pat them down at the airport security checkpoint.”
But
Eugene Delgaudio (R), who represents Louden County, Virginia, on the
Board of Supervisors, was one of the first people to spot the special
effect it would have on children. He explains himself and his mission in
this fundraising
letter he sent to his supporters:
I
took a stand against the TSA and their “porno scanners” and blatant
groping. And I took a stand against their policy of “non-discrimination”
which subjects you and me to humiliation and dehumanization at the
hands of practicing homosexuals. How it exposes those most precious to
us—our children—to being photographed by naked scanners or explicit
sexual touching by practicing homosexuals…. These TSA policies force
terrified parents to choose between salivating radical homosexual
employees viewing pornographic images of their child or a full-on
molestation.
So… there’s that.
6. Homosexuality-fostering foster care.California’s (
AB-1856)
Bill requires that the existing training programs mandated for foster
parents and caregivers include “instruction on cultural competency and
sensitivity relating to, and best practices for, providing adequate
care” to LGBT youth. Focus on the Family was concerned that the bill
would “drive Christian couples away.” If this happens, how many children
will be denied the gift of unloving and homophobic foster parents who
would opt out of foster care before undergoing sensitivity training?
But it’s much worse than that.
As Dale O’Leary, author of
The Gender Agenda and One Man, One Woman explains,
“A child who’s been sexually abused by a person of the same sex,
(particularly if the child is a boy), is going to have doubts about his
identity. And he needs help to get through that. If we push
homosexuality on him, or these gender-identity ideas, it’s just going to
confuse him… One of the outcomes of sexual child abuse is concern about
one’s sexual attractions and identity.”
Luckily, Dale
isn’t the only one with a good head on her shoulders. Phil Burress,
president of the Ohio-based anti-gay group Citizens for Community
Values, says, “This is the way the homosexual activists continue to
build their numbers — is to get people confused about their gender
identity and start acting out….”
Every time someone goes through sensitivity training countless otherwise straight youth become confused into being gay.
7. Anti bullying-bullying.Of
course the gay agenda targets schools, where they can directly
indoctrinate children by teaching tolerance and, even worse,
discouraging bullying. Self-described “historian” David Barton
argues that
bullying of LGBT kids is a figment of the liberal imagination and that
the bullies are in fact gay agitators who lob spitballs of tolerance at
the schools: “It’s not the schools that are doing bullying, it’s the
people from outside the schools coming in and saying ‘oh you got a
bullying problem and we need to teach a course for you.’ The people
living there didn’t see any problem.”
Liberty Counsel’s
public policy analyst Shawn Akers calls out anti-bullying education for
what it really is: “a form of indoctrination and reeducation that smacks
of socialist and communist countries.” And for Matt Barber, director of
cultural affairs with Liberty Counsel, anti bullying is nothing less
than a “homo-fascist tactic.” One of the tools these
homo-fascist-bullies-in-anti-bullies’-clothing use is the
Day of Silence, “a
day of
action in which students across the country vow to take a form of
silence to call attention to the silencing effect of anti-LGBT bullying
and harassment in schools.”
But such efforts to call
attention to the physical and emotional abuse of LGBT youth is too much
for many Christians to bear. So, some right-wing organizations like Save
California, Liberty Council and American Family Association are
speaking truth to… silence, by organizing “Day Of Silence Walkouts,” in
which kids are encouraged to stay home from if their school participates
in the anti-bullying day. An anti-bullying message is clearly radical
sexual propaganda. According to Liberty Council, the Gay, Lesbian,
Straight Education Network (GLSEN), which organizes the National Day of
Silence, “promotes a radical sexualized agenda, including the promotion
of books that encourage sex between adults and minors. The Day of
Silence has been turned into a homosexual and transsexual promotion
agenda. The Day of Silence is not about tolerance or bullying. It is
about pushing a sexual agenda. Students and staff who disagree with a
radical sexualized agenda are demonized and made to feel like
outsiders.”
Save California’s Randy Thomasson describes
the Day of Silence as “another day of brainwashing for children. To have
an entire academic day to be hijacked and disrupted is just a wasted
school day… They should be taken into detention. They shouldn’t be
allowed to make a school day a day of sexual political activism.”
As for the whole
higher depression
and suicide rates among youth bullied over their perceived sexual
orientation thing, that just goes with the territory of homosexuality,
according to
Barber:
“Kids who are engaging in homosexual behavior often look inward and
know that what they are doing is unnatural, is wrong, is immoral, and so
they become depressed and the instances of suicide can rise there as
well.” In other words, it’s the homosexuality, not the homophobia and
the bullying that are at fault.
8. Public miseducation. The
indoctrination doesn’t stop with the anti-bullying or the Day of
Silence. It seeps into the very school curriculum. As David Barton
warns, “I guarantee you [your kids] are getting homosexual
indoctrination…. I don’t care whether you’re in a rural area or not,
because this is so much a part of textbooks, so much a part of
curricular stuff, so much a part of what goes on with other kids.”
California’s
SB 48 Bill
mandates that curricula and textbooks include “the role and
contributions of both men and women, Native Americans, African
Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Pacific Islanders,
European Americans, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans,
persons with disabilities, and members of other ethnic and cultural
groups” to California and society, in general. It’s bad enough to be
forced to recognize women and minorities. But talking about lesbian,
gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans is just un-American! Before the
bill was passed, Save California’s Thomasson
warned it
“would mandate new role models— homosexual, bisexual, transsexual role
models,” who “kids as young as kindergarten would have to admire.”
Thomasson was particularly worried that children would be forced to
learn about
Elton John.
Thomasson predicted, “This is the kind of garbage that will be taught
to kids” as the kids are led “like lambs to the slaughter.”
9. SpongeBob NOT so SquarePants.Sea
sponges may reproduce asexually. So a show whose main character is a
sponge is the perfect cover for a homosexual agenda. The animated series
“SpongeBob SquarePants,” about a sponge who spends an awful lot of time
holding hands with his starfish “friend” Patrick, proves this. James C.
Dobson, the founder of the conservative evangelical organization Focus
on the Family, outed the sea creature for appearing in what he
called a
“pro-homosexual video.” It turns out, SpongeBob, along with Barney and
Jimmy Neutron, and other creations, were in a video that promoted… hold
on… tolerance.
According to Dobson, the
tolerance-peddlers behind this project were going to send copies of the
video to thousands of children’s schools, where children would be forced
to take a “tolerance pledge” that included tolerating “sexual
identity.” Actually, and shockingly, Dobson got the facts wrong. The
video featuring SpongeBob was made by the We Are Family Foundation,
which Nile Rodgers (who wrote the disco anthem “We Are Family,”) founded
after 9/11 to teach children about cultural tolerance. There is no
pledge mentioned in the video. Rodgers assumes that Dobson confused his
foundation, which doesn’t bring up sexual orientation, with “We Are
Family,” a group supporting LGBT youth.
But Dobson would
not be swayed by facts. As his assistant Paul Batura explained, “We see
the video as an insidious means by which the organization is
manipulating and potentially brainwashing kids….It is a classic bait and
switch.”
10. Teletubby TWINKy Winky.The
Teletubbies who star in the show aimed at pre-schoolers may be
adorable. But they are far from innocent. In a not-so-subtle article
called “Parents Alert: Tinky Winky Comes Out of the Closet,” the late
Jerry Falwell, of Moral Majority and Liberty College, exposed the show’s
“subtle depictions” of homesexualism. Falwell
analyzed the
visual cues found in the particular character of Tinky Winky: “He is
purple—the gay-pride color; and his antenna is shaped like a
triangle—the gay-pride symbol.”
Falwell must have been
too busy suppressing his gag reflex to mention that the character also
rubs his sexuality in the face of innocent pre-schoolers who have no
idea what sexuality is by wearing a bag. But he did state, “As a
Christian I feel that role modeling the gay lifestyle is damaging to the
moral lives of children.”
(Credit: Warner Brothers)
According to some, the Oscar-winning animated kids’ film is not the
charming, comedic musical critics have universally praised, but rather
Hollywood’s latest sinister venture in gay propaganda. Moreover,
Disney’s latest blockbuster, based on a Hans Christian Anderson story,
is not an isolated assault on the civilized world’s core principle of
heterosexuality, but one of the countless (10, if we’re counting)
examples of seemingly child-friendly cultural and social entities that
are actually gay conversion tools. Let’s take a look at the dangers the
Christian Right has alerted us to.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment-- or suggestions, particularly of topics and places you'd like to see covered